Sharing this question on Twitter or Facebook, or by asking someone to answer can improve results.
Answers
Art doesn't have to tell a story (for instance, abstract art); however every single piece of art communicates something to the viewer whether you intend for it to or not. The interpretation will vary from person to person. But to each individual person the art work may communicate sad feelings or happiness and so on.
I can agree with the above, but sometimes, it has a story to tell to others. For example, art that depicted slavery tells us the real-life stories of slaves. Picture Arts, used by many ingenious tribes, depicted many different kinds of stories. We may think they don't exist. But they do, if you go to historical grounds or museums.
Artistic works can be interpreted in many different ways. Some are specific in their design. For example, Picasso's Guernica was his reaction to the destruction of a small village. The emotionally content is overpowering. Yet, there are times at the LA Museum when I have viewed a blank canvas with a yellow line. Honestly, that is the type of creation that makes me wonder about the definition of art. Wonderful storytelling art can be found in Rockwell's works.
Click here/participate/verify_captcha.phpSubmit AnswerCancelYesNoError!ConfirmThe operation is successful.Click hereWhat do you want to ask?
Answered by Guest Just now
/participate/root/art/must-art-communicate-something-or-be-about-something-should-art-tell-a-story/subscribe_qn.php/participate/root/art/must-art-communicate-something-or-be-about-something-should-art-tell-a-story/unsubscribe_qn.phpYou have subscribed to this question.You have unsubscribed to this question.SubscribeUnsubscribe/participate/get_answer.phpReport ThisSubmitInformation!